Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Metadata
slug: amdeberhan-chen-moll-sagan-2014-reciprocal-tail-floor-conjecture-4-6
bibkey: amdeberhanchenmollsagan2014fibonomial
doi: 10.1007/s00026-014-0242-9
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.6511v2
triage: theorem
motivation_gids:
  - D5/S1/Recurrence/LinearRows/ACMSReciprocalTailFloor.result

Floors of reciprocal generalized Fibonacci tails

Problem

Amdeberhan, Chen, Moll and Sagan, Generalized Fibonacci polynomials and Fibonomial coefficients, Annals of Combinatorics 18 (2014), 541–562, Conjecture 4.6, first clause:

If with and then $\left\lfloor\left(\sum_{k=n}^{\infty}1/{rk}{s,-t}\right)^{-1}\right\rfloor ={rn}{s,-t}-{r(n-1)}_{s,-t}-1$.

The source defines as the positive integers and , , . The squared-reciprocal clause is a separate question.

Statement echo

Source clauseLean counterpartFidelity
Integral coefficients and the three recurrence casesULiteral recursive definition over integers and natural indices.
claim’s t < s and 1 ≤ tSame inequalities.
The excluded-pair hypothesisSame pair and signs.
Natural indices with 1 ≤ n, 1 ≤ rExactly positive indices.
Tail starting at Real reciprocal of U s (-t) (r * (n + k)), summed over natural Reindexing, with the integer denominator cast to the reals.
Convergence presupposed by the sourceExplicit Summable conjunctPrevents a divergent tsum from satisfying the identity vacuously.
Reciprocal, integer floor and difference endpointSecond conjunct of claimNatural subtraction at is ordinary subtraction because .

Motivation

This is the first-tier external named conjecture preregistered in #18768. The settling node is D5/S1/Recurrence/LinearRows/ACMSReciprocalTailFloor.result. It proves the complete first clause, including convergence, with symbolic parameters and stride. The source acknowledgement is D5/L/ArithUnits/amdeberhanchenmollsagan2014fibonomial.

Gap

The growing Cassini defect for a negative second coefficient requires a uniform upper comparison. A result for a unit second coefficient alone does not cover arbitrary integral . Literature completeness remains ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED; the preregistration distinguishes direct readings from search-seat reports of partial results.

Route

Write , , and let be the trace of the th power of the companion matrix. The frozen D5.S0.Observation.MatrixTracePowerSum.pow_add_two, used in stride_rec, gives the stride recurrence. Integer induction supplies , and without a root formula.

For a real recurrence satisfying RecData, put . The private helpers prove , , and . The positive denominators then give and, when , , where . The reciprocal limits vanish by linear growth. With the integer endpoint , these bounds give . The case uses positivity and the strict lower tail estimate.

Falsifier

An admissible integral quadruple with a different floor, or a failure of convergence, contradicts the settled proposition. The excluded pair has and a harmonic tail. A finite numerical check cannot establish the universally quantified result.

Evidence

D5.S1.Recurrence.LinearRows.ACMSReciprocalTailFloor.result proves claim. The only public mathematical definitions are U and claim; the analytic and integer-recurrence helpers are private. The axiom closure of every public declaration is contained in .

Escape audit unfinished: #19868, covering D5.S1.Recurrence.LinearRows.ACMSReciprocalTailFloor.result. No faithful enrolled infinite-family readout with the required reconstruction, variation, sensitivity and observational-dependence proofs is supplied. No declared_validated registration is asserted.

Experiment

Independent numerical checks at commit 281d694121129f1956238980908f2f72a8dae758. Command: python3 check.py, from that directory; exit 0. Script SHA-256: 2c617d7bdee2463146b5e021bc12cd0711e409ee54c57ba781ad7011947fa86e. The 260-digit calculation with cutoff reports 1,300 passing floor and tail-bound cases for , , , and . Exact Cassini and domination checks have zero failures for , , excluding , and . The check also verifies the first eleven values for ; divergence is the harmonic-series argument, not an experimental conclusion. These are computed finite checks.

Triage

What the settlement shows

ItemStatus and evidence
Root-free companion bounds and Proved, kernel-checked private stride_parameters, using integer_growth and matrix_shape; used by public result. The square-root/Binet route is unnecessary for this proof.
Real-coefficient recurrence theorem under RecDataProved, kernel-checked private recurrence_floor. Its are real; only the endpoint is an integer, with . For an integral sequence this endpoint is integral, so the general integral-recurrence conclusion in the preregistration follows by the same theorem.
Linear growth suffices for the telescope limitsProved, kernel-checked private growth, inv_b_limit, telescoping_has_sum, upper_has_sum and tail_lower. No geometric-series estimate is a premise.
Conjecture 4.6, squared-reciprocal second clauseOpen; no declaration in this module settles it.
Complete literature assertion that no prior proof settles the first clause, including the scope of partial resultsOpen, ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED; literature reading and attributed reports in #18768, not a kernel theorem.

The decisive mechanism is uniform domination of the growing Cassini defect, which supplies the shifted telescoping upper bound. The floor interval is , with the endpoint included. The helpers extend the analytic argument to real recurrence data satisfying their explicit inequalities; no unrestricted real-parameter floor theorem is claimed.

The first-clause statement of Conjecture 4.6 is therefore available as a theorem. The squared-reciprocal clause and claims about other source results depending on it remain open here. No inventory of all downstream literature consequences is asserted. Prior partial results are reported in #18768: Cui et al., arXiv:2212.02639v2, Theorem 1.7, Case 1 has a restricted negative coefficient and a defect-domination hypothesis; Park, arXiv:1407.8086, Theorem 18 is search-seat reported. Their complete scope and the completeness of this comparison remain ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED.

ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED

The literature screen is the one attributed in #18768. It includes direct readings of the source and Cui et al.; the other partial-result claims are attributed search-seat reports. It does not prove that all prior literature has been found or that none contains a prior proof. Four-slot escape registration remains unfinished under #19868. The second conjecture clause and a complete analysis of downstream source dependencies remain open.