Metadata
slug: hirai-nieuwboer-walter-2023-coth-constant
bibkey: hirai2023interiorpoint
doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.04771
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04771
triage: theorem
motivation_gids:
- D5/S3/Analytic/Hyperbolic/HiraiNieuwboerWalterCothConstant.result
Optimal hyperbolic cotangent constant
Problem
Hirai–Nieuwboer–Walter, arXiv:2303.04771v2, §5, Lemma 5.13 and Remark 5.14:
“Lemma 5.13. The constant C = √2 is such that for all a, b ∈ ℝ, one has |coth((a − b)/2) (a coth(a/2) − b coth(b/2))| ≤ C √(ab(a − b) coth(a/2) coth(b/2) coth((a − b)/2)).”
“Remark 5.14. We conjecture, based on numerical evidence, that the optimal constant in the above inequality is C = 1/√2.”
The source proves the coefficient and conjectures the optimal coefficient . The repository resolves that conjecture: the optimal constant in
is . The quantifiers range over all real with , , and . Optimality means that for every real , some such pair violates the estimate strictly. Here and square roots are nonnegative real roots.
Motivation
The scalar inequality controls third derivatives of squared Riemannian distance on positive definite matrices. Through the paper’s Theorem 5.15, the sharp constant gives the consequence “squared distance on PD(n) is 8-self-concordant.” The geometric consequence is not formalized here.
Gap
Both the uniform bound and its sharpness require analytic arguments over unbounded real inputs, including the removable singularity as one input tends to zero. Finite sampling does not prove either quantified assertion.
Route
Extend by , and put . On the nonnegative half-line, , is nondecreasing and away from zero; continuity supplies the endpoint. Also is nondecreasing and .
For , and , the Lipschitz estimate and monotonicity give
Evenness and therefore yield
Substitute , and . The radicand equals on the permitted domain, and the squared ratio of the left side to its square root is at most .
For sharpness, let and choose . Since ,
The function
is continuous at zero. Using and gives . Therefore some with still satisfies . The distinct nonzero pair , then strictly violates the estimate with coefficient .
| Needed interface | Reused source | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Cotangent product lower bound | ThermalCoefficientFloor.one_le_self_mul_coth | Establish for positive inputs |
| Scaled cotangent function and derivative | ArimotoHyperbolic.f, f_hasDerivAt | Differentiate away from zero |
| Positive derivative numerator | ArimotoHyperbolic.sinh_cosh_sub_pos | Show monotonicity of |
| Real hyperbolic tangent derivative | LinearCayleyScaleFlow.real_tanh_hasDerivAt | Differentiate |
Falsifier
A pair of distinct nonzero real inputs violating the estimate at refutes the upper bound. A strictly smaller real coefficient satisfying the estimate at every permitted pair refutes optimality.
Evidence
The exact formal statement is claim, with the settling declaration
result : claim in
D5/S3/Analytic/Hyperbolic/HiraiNieuwboerWalterCothConstant.lean.
The first conjunct is the uniform estimate; the second supplies a strict
counterexample for every smaller real coefficient.
Triage
(i) The uniform estimate at is PROVED by result : claim.
(ii) The failure of every is PROVED by the second conjunct
of result : claim.
The consequence “squared distance on PD(n) is 8-self-concordant” follows via the paper’s Theorem 5.15; it is not formalized here.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Bibliographic priority and the absence of a subsequent proof have not been independently established. The source attribution uses arXiv:2303.04771v2, §5, Lemma 5.13 and Remark 5.14; the geometric implication uses Theorem 5.15.