slug: oeis-a254748-twin-prime-mean-no-superdivisor bibkey: gerasimov2015a254748 doi: null url: https://oeis.org/A254748 triage: theorem motivation_gids:
- D5/S3/Arith/Congruence/GerasimovTwinPrimeMeanNoSuperdivisor
The A254748 twin-prime mean has no superdivisor
Problem
OEIS A254748, NAME (%N, verbatim):
Numbers without superdivisors: numbers n such that n/k + n fails to divide at least one of (n/k)^(n/k) + n, (n/k)^n + n/k or n^(n/k) + n/k for any divisor k of n.
COMMENT (%C, verbatim):
Zerosuperdivisor numbers. Numbers n such that A247477(n) = 0.
COMMENT (%C, verbatim):
Conjecture: Average of twin prime pairs (A014574) are zerosuperdivisor numbers.
AUTHOR (%A, verbatim):
Juri-Stepan Gerasimov, Feb 07 2015
The A247477 superdivisor definition is: a divisor k is a superdivisor of n when
n/k + n divides each of (n/k)^(n/k) + n, (n/k)^n + n/k, and
n^(n/k) + n/k, with all division interpreted in ℕ (exact when k ∣ n).
The literal claim is
∀ p : ℕ, Nat.Prime p → Nat.Prime (p + 2) → ∀ k : ℕ, 1 ≤ k → k ∣ p + 1 → ¬ IsSuperdivisor (p + 1) k,
where IsSuperdivisor is the three-clause predicate above and the quotient is
natural-number division. The perfect-number sentence in A254748 is NOT claimed.
Motivation
The conjecture asserts that the arithmetic mean of every twin-prime pair is a zerosuperdivisor number. The theorem proves that every positive divisor of that mean fails the A247477 superdivisor predicate.
Gap
The dated surfaces recorded in preregistration issue #7602 and the probe were
OEIS A254748 all 34 revisions: revision #26 (2015-02-22) added the conjecture,
and revision #34 still carries it, with no proof or refutation. The A247477
Neder 2019 odd-d characterization and Greathouse 2015 parity/residue exclusions
do not prove the target. An arXiv search returned 0; the only superdivisor
hit was unrelated supergeometry. OEIS Open arXiv:2608.11941v2 and
LeanOpenProblems(-results) returned 0. The formal-conjectures search returned
0. A GitHub exact-sentence search found only an OEIS mirror. The MathOverflow API
returned 0 (HTML 403). The OpenAlex /works budget was exhausted and
autocomplete returned 0 - ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED. The result is elementary; no
priority claim is made.
Route
Prove the stronger statement for every even n at least 4 with n - 1 prime. For
a divisor k of n put d = n/k. The first two superdivisor conditions, reduced in
ZMod (k + 1), force the multiplicative order r of d to divide both d - 1 and
2(n - 1). Coprime cancellation gives r ∣ 2. The case r = 1 is excluded, so
r = 2. Then d is -1 modulo k+1 and n is 1 modulo k+1, making k+1 a proper
divisor of the prime n - 1, a contradiction. For a twin-prime mean n = p+1,
p is odd and prime, so the stronger statement applies.
Falsifier
A prime p with p+2 prime and a positive divisor k of p+1 for which all three A247477 divisibility conditions hold would refute the theorem.
Evidence
- Lean module:
D5/S3/Arith/Congruence/GerasimovTwinPrimeMeanNoSuperdivisor.lean. - Main theorem:
gerasimov_a254748, with std3 axiom closure[propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound]. - Orchestrator bounded checks: twin-prime means n <= 2 x 10^5 and even n <= 6 x 10^4 with n - 1 prime, with 0 violations.
- Probe checks: all 2160 twin-prime pairs with p+2 <= 200000 (67037 divisor checks) and all 6056 even n <= 60000 with n - 1 prime (115865 checks), with 0 violations.
- Controls:
IsSuperdivisor(3,1) = true,IsSuperdivisor(10,2) = true,IsSuperdivisor(4,1) = false, andIsSuperdivisor(6,2) = false.
Triage
theorem
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
OpenAlex was exhausted, the bounded searches are finite, and no priority claim is made. The literature search is not an exhaustive proof of novelty.