Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help


slug: oeis-a300657-krizek-divisor-sigma-mod-noncomposite bibkey: krizek2018a300657 doi: null url: https://oeis.org/A300657 triage: theorem motivation_gids:

  • D5/S3/ArithSums/KrizekDivisorSigmaModNoncomposite.result

Krizek’s A300657 noncomposite characterization

Problem

OEIS A300657 defines

a(n) = Sum_{d|n} sigma(d) mod d.

Its Comment line states verbatim:

a(n) >= A054024(n). Conjecture: a(n) = A054024(n) only for the noncomposite numbers A008578.

The entry’s Author line states verbatim:

Jaroslav Krizek, Mar 10 2018

Here A054024(n) = sigma(n) mod n, and A008578 consists of one and the primes. With

a300657(n) = Sum_{d|n} (sigma(d) mod d),

the proved equivalence, with all quantifiers explicit, is: for every natural number n, if 1 <= n, then

a300657(n) = sigma(n) mod n if and only if n = 1 or n is prime.

Motivation

The conjecture asks for an exact characterization, rather than a one-sided bound or a verification over a finite range. The theorem identifies every natural index in the source’s stated noncomposite class.

Gap

The OEIS A300657 entry was read in full and still labels the characterization as a conjecture. A MathDB search returned 0 hits. The repository search before this addition returned no hit for A300657. These are bounded search results, not an exhaustive claim that no independent proof exists.

Route

For n = 1 and for prime n, the divisor set evaluates directly and the equality follows. Conversely, suppose n >= 2 is composite and let p be its least prime factor. Then p is a proper divisor of n, while sigma(p) mod p = 1. Splitting the divisor sum at n, the asserted equality would force the sum over all proper divisors to be zero. Nonnegativity would then force its p term to be zero, contradicting the preceding value one.

Falsifier

A natural n >= 1 for which the displayed equality and the condition n = 1 or Prime(n) have different truth values would refute the theorem. Changing the divisor convention, the sigma function, or the natural-number remainder changes the claim.

Evidence

The source statement and definitions are recorded in Library/ArithSums/krizek2018a300657.md. The frozen theorem is D5/S3/ArithSums/KrizekDivisorSigmaModNoncomposite.result, with declaration statement ID sha256:ec34455025c7da17b9598d70580779fac5ae4368e58a2dd453d57f1f4e5529d9. Its axiom closure is exactly propext, Classical.choice, and Quot.sound. The module freeze has no prerequisite frozen project nodes; the proof uses only pinned Mathlib facts.

Triage

First tier: an explicitly labelled conjecture in an OEIS entry, preregistered in issue #8386. Resolution: proved.

Declarationproof_shapecomputational_content.kindadmission_basis
resultbind-onlynoneopen-problem-resolution

After unfolding the local definition, the proof consists of instantiating pinned divisor and sigma lemmas, splitting a finite sum, choosing the least prime factor, and arithmetic normalization. It therefore has no escape witness. The external conjecture is admitted under open-problem-resolution, not escape-witness. The uniform symbolic theorem is not bounded enumeration, checker infrastructure, numeric reduction, or a certified finite instance, so utility: none applies.

ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED

The bounded literature checks do not establish exhaustive worldwide novelty, priority, or the absence of an independent proof. The Lean kernel does not authenticate the external OEIS page or its revision history.