Estimation / CONCEPT
Bounds and Contraction for the Descent Defect
The optimal finite quotient-descent error is controlled by the same-fiber total-variation defect, and deterministic target postprocessing contracts that defect.
Closed
DIRECT PREREQUISITES2
DIRECT CONSEQUENCES3
PROOF DEPTH4
DOCUMENT LINKS1
Best descent error is at least half the fiber defect
RELATIONSHIP ATLAS
Every connection, in context.
Direct recorded relationships
Proof dependencyStructural affinityDocument link
Certified topology / UPSTREAM
Prerequisites
Certified topology / DOWNSTREAM
Consequences
RELATED KNOWLEDGE
Structural connections
- Approximate Simulation Without Exact Attainmentstructural-affinity · Closed
- Bhattacharyya Affinity and the Bretagnolle--Huber Boundstructural-affinity · Closed
- Bounded-Risk Simulator Transportstructural-affinity · Closed
- Data Processing for Finite Total Variationstructural-affinity · Closed
- Equality in Total-Variation Data Processingstructural-affinity · Closed
- Finite Bayes-Risk Dominance Criterionstructural-affinity · Closed
- Finite Deficiency Risk Transferstructural-affinity · Closed
- Finite Deficiency Trianglestructural-affinity · Closed
- Green-Class Window Total Variationstructural-affinity · Closed
- Le Cam's Two-Point Lemma for Every Finite Teststructural-affinity · Closed
- Metric Laws and Variational Characterization for Finite Total Variationstructural-affinity · Closed
- Product Subadditivity of Total Variationstructural-affinity · Closed
- The Finite Negentropy Budgetstructural-affinity · Closed
- Zero Descent Defect and Exact Lumpabilitystructural-affinity · Closed
Documents & exposition
Other authored & advisory relationships
None recorded in this release.
LIBRARY / RELEASE VERSIONS
Content history
Loading release versions...
Browse the archiveCertified provenance