Budget and Efficiency Assembly
Abstract
Refinement information, innovation counts, and finite closure-spectrum memory budgets are assembled on the canonical finite carriers.
Theorem 1.1 (Refinement gain, innovation budget, and closure-spectrum telescope).
Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Entropy/Observation/BudgetEfficiencyAssembly.budget_efficiency_assembly (✓ std3). ∎
Source. Repository-derived.
Commentary.
The finite past/future law and deterministic fine-to-coarse readout use the canonical predictive-memory and refinement-gain definitions. The first conjunct is the imported exact decomposition and its nonnegativity.
A nonnegative summable innovation sequence with a total budget H obeys the canonical threshold-count bound. The final conjunct applies the finite observation quotient and complete-future quotient to the closure-spectrum log telescope; the endpoint is the realized readout image, not an arbitrary codomain complement.
No new probability law, quotient, or resolution object is declared. The finite/infinite quotient bridge is proved locally from the existing future relations and the pinned quotient-range equivalence.
References
- Truth anchor:
D5/S3/Entropy/Observation/BudgetEfficiencyAssembly.budget_efficiency_assembly - Dependency: D5/S3/ConceptDynamics/Completion/CompletionInformationCost
- Dependency: D5/S3/Entropy/EntropyNonneg
- Dependency: D5/S3/Entropy/Observation/ConditionalChoiceOutcomeChainRule
- Dependency: D5/S3/Entropy/Submodularity/RefinementInformationDecomposition
- Dependency: D5/S3/Observer/Prediction/StableDepthCardinalityBounds
- Dependency: D5/S3/Observer/Separation/FiniteHistoryStability
- Dependency: D5/S3/Observer/Tomography/InnovationCountBound
- Dependency: D5/S3/ObserverMemory/Prediction/ConditionalEntropyStability