Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Conditional subentropy and guessing

Abstract

The simplex-integral conditional subentropy of a classical-quantum state is bounded by guessing min-entropy.

Definition 1.1 (C).

Formalization. D5/S3/Quantum/Measurement/ConditionalSubentropyGuessingBound.C (✓ std3).

Citation. Nilanjana Datta, Tony Dorlas, Richard Jozsa, Fabio Benatti (2014). Properties of subentropy. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1310.1312. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1312v1.

Commentary.

Equation (2), PDF page 2: “Q(ρ) = ⟨H(M(ρ))⟩_M − C_n where C_n := 1/2 + 1/3 + … + 1/n.” The sum runs from 2 through n, inclusive.

Definition 1.2 (simplexCoords).

Formalization. D5/S3/Quantum/Measurement/ConditionalSubentropyGuessingBound.simplexCoords (✓ std3).

Citation. Nilanjana Datta, Tony Dorlas, Richard Jozsa, Fabio Benatti (2014). Properties of subentropy. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1310.1312. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1312v1.

Commentary.

Equation (3), PDF page 2: “this uniform measure (normalised to have total volume unity) is given by dx = (n − 1)! dx_1 … dx_{n−1}.” The first n−1 coordinates are nonnegative and have sum at most one.

Lemma 1.3 (simplex_volume).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Quantum/Measurement/ConditionalSubentropyGuessingBound.simplex_volume (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

The standard simplex in n coordinates has volume equal to the reciprocal of n factorial.

Lemma 1.4 (simplex_sum_boundary_null).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Quantum/Measurement/ConditionalSubentropyGuessingBound.simplex_sum_boundary_null (✓ std3). ∎

Source. Repository-derived.

Commentary.

Every positive level set of the coordinate sum has zero volume.

Definition 1.5 (subentropySpectrum).

Formalization. D5/S3/Quantum/Measurement/ConditionalSubentropyGuessingBound.subentropySpectrum (✓ std3).

Citation. Nilanjana Datta, Tony Dorlas, Richard Jozsa, Fabio Benatti (2014). Properties of subentropy. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1310.1312. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1312v1.

Commentary.

Equation (4), PDF page 2: “Introducing η(y) := −y ln y, we then obtain a third expression for the subentropy from eq.(2): Q(ρ) = n ∫_{Δn} η(λ · x) dx − C_n.” Real.negMulLog is η. The Lebesgue integral is multiplied by (n−1)!, as in equation (3).

Definition 1.6 (subentropy).

Formalization. D5/S3/Quantum/Measurement/ConditionalSubentropyGuessingBound.subentropy (✓ std3).

Citation. Nilanjana Datta, Tony Dorlas, Richard Jozsa, Fabio Benatti (2014). Properties of subentropy. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1310.1312. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1312v1.

Commentary.

Equation (4), PDF page 2: “Introducing η(y) := −y ln y, we then obtain a third expression for the subentropy from eq.(2): Q(ρ) = n ∫_{Δn} η(λ · x) dx − C_n.” R supplies its real Hermitian eigenvalues, including zero and repeated eigenvalues.

Definition 1.7 (pGuess).

Formalization. D5/S3/Quantum/Measurement/ConditionalSubentropyGuessingBound.pGuess (✓ std3).

Citation. Nilanjana Datta, Tony Dorlas, Richard Jozsa, Fabio Benatti (2014). Properties of subentropy. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1310.1312. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1312v1.

Commentary.

PDF page 9: “p_guess(X|B) = max_{{E_x}:POVM} Σ_x p_x Tr(E_x ρ^x_B), where the maximization is over all possible POVMs: {E_x : E_x ≥ 0 ∀ x; Σ_x E_x = I}.” A x is p_xρ_B^x. The supremum is over these finite-POVM scores.

Definition 1.8 (claim).

Formalization. D5/S3/Quantum/Measurement/ConditionalSubentropyGuessingBound.claim (✓ std3).

Citation. Nilanjana Datta, Tony Dorlas, Richard Jozsa, Fabio Benatti (2014). Properties of subentropy. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1310.1312. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1312v1.

Commentary.

Conjecture 2, PDF page 9: “For a c-q state ρ_XB, the conditional subentropy Q(X|B) satisfies the following bound: Q(X|B) ≤ H_min(X|B) = − ln p_guess(X|B).” Equation (13), PDF page 8: “we define the conditional subentropy to be Q(A|B)_ρ := Q(ρ_AB) − Q(ρ_B)”. X and B are arbitrary finite types with decidable equality. A has positive semidefinite blocks of total trace one. Matrix.blockDiagonal A is the joint state, and the sum of A is its B marginal. Natural logarithms are used.

Theorem 1.9 (result).

Proof. Machine-checked in Lean as D5/S3/Quantum/Measurement/ConditionalSubentropyGuessingBound.result (✓ std3). ∎

Resolves. Problems/datta-dorlas-jozsa-benatti-2014-conditional-subentropy-conjecture-2 (proved) by D5/S3/Quantum/Measurement/ConditionalSubentropyGuessingBound.result.

Source. Repository-derived.

Acknowledgement. Nilanjana Datta, Tony Dorlas, Richard Jozsa, Fabio Benatti (2014). Properties of subentropy. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1310.1312. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1312v1.

Commentary.

The simplex integral equals the determinant-integral subentropy on positive semidefinite trace-one matrices. Gaussian radial decomposition proves this equality without a simple-spectrum assumption. Normalizing the nonzero blocks gives a probability ensemble; zero blocks contribute zero. The ensemble guessing bound gives the inequality.

References